WAR-GAME
What if several tracks go dark together? Union of blast radii with shortest-tier attribution. Run a named scenario or cut a custom set of tracks — lead demos here after single-node Blast Radius.
COUNTER-CUT
China materials counter-cut
China materials counter-cut: 8 firms go dark, taking 197 downstream firms with them, including 4 DoD-exposed suppliers, wiping out 32 segments.
- The mirror image of the other scenarios: China restricts materials exports to the West instead of the West restricting sales to China. China's Ministry of Commerce has run an escalating sequence since late 2024 — a December 2024 ban on gallium, germanium, antimony, and graphite exports to the US; an April 2025 licensing regime covering seven rare-earth elements and related magnets; an October 2025 rule extending licensing to any foreign-made product containing more than 0.1% China-origin rare-earth content; a partial suspension of that extraterritorial rule in November 2025 as part of a trade truce; and a June-July 2026 re-escalation applying licensing requirements to additional EU-headquartered firms.
- Two honest limits, not one. (1) The raw rare-earth and gallium/germanium miners and refiners named in the real export-control actions above are not semiconductor firms and are not tracked in this graph — the cut below reaches only China/Hong Kong-headquartered firms already in the graph's materials segment (silicon wafers, substrates, photoresists and specialty chemicals, specialty gases, sputtering targets), the graph's nearest proxy for that materials leverage, not the export-control actions themselves. (2) Same total-loss, no-substitution assumption as every other scenario — no drawdown of buyer inventory, no re-qualification of alternate sources mid-crisis. With exactly 8 China/HK-HQ materials firms in the graph today, this scenario cuts all of them; the anchor+fill rule still governs the ordering.
- How much of Western semiconductor fabrication depends on China-origin materials inputs today, and is that exposure concentrated in a few chokepoint firms or diffuse across the materials layer?
Trigger
Assumption
Question
8
Sources cut
197
Tracks hit
4
DoD exposed
195
Overlap
Per-source blast (alone)
- Shengyi Technology195 tracks · 4 DoD
- Shennan Circuits195 tracks · 4 DoD
- Kingboard Holdings195 tracks · 4 DoD
- National Silicon Industry Group197 tracks · 4 DoD
- Suzhou Crystal Clear Chemical (Jingrui)0 tracks · 0 DoD
- Ningbo Jiangfeng Electronic Material (Konfoong)0 tracks · 0 DoD
- Jiangsu Nata Opto-electronic Material (Nanda Optoelectronics)0 tracks · 0 DoD
- TanKeBlue Semiconductor0 tracks · 0 DoD
Track Goes Dark
Shengyi Technology + Shennan Circuits + Kingboard Holdings + National Silicon Industry Group + Suzhou Crystal Clear Chemical (Jingrui) + Ningbo Jiangfeng Electronic Material (Konfoong) + Jiangsu Nata Opto-electronic Material (Nanda Optoelectronics) + TanKeBlue Semiconductor
197 tracks downstream
→
Tier 1 · direct10
Tier 2 · indirect149
Marvell Technology83
United StatesDoD $184.3M
Valens Semiconductor42
IsraelDoD $28.3M
Scale AI24
United StatesDoD $105.6M
StarFive79
China
GigaDevice Semiconductor79
China
Ingenic Semiconductor79
China
Broadcom77
United States
Inspur71
China
Faraday Technology64
Taiwan
Sophgo63
China
HiSilicon63
China
Espressif Systems63
China
+137 more
Tier 3 · indirect38